Pickett-Holmes v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan
712 N.W.2d 449, 474 Mich. 1119, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 723
This text of 712 N.W.2d 449 (Pickett-Holmes v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pickett-Holmes v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan, 712 N.W.2d 449, 474 Mich. 1119, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 723 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Tracey PICKETT-HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
712 N.W.2d 449, 474 Mich. 1119, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-holmes-v-farm-bureau-mutual-insurance-comp-mich-2006.