Picket v. Weaver
5 Johns. 122
Opinion
The declaration sufficiently charges the defendant below, with selling spirituous liquors, by retail, without license; and the proof supported the charge. We have never required the same technical formality and precision in pleadings, before a justice, as in this court. The pleadings are to be conducted by the parties themselves, without the aid of an attorney; and the court on a review, by certiorari, is to determine upon the right of the case. The judgment below ought to be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Picket v. Weaver, 5 Johns. 122 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
5 Johns. 122 (Picket v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Isaac Baker v. James Allen
2 Tenn. 175 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1812)
State v. Vance
1 Tenn. 481 (Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1809)