Pickering v. Pickering

58 A.D.2d 1039, 397 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13269
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1977·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying his motion to terminate an order directing him to support his wife and five children. He alleges that the order is invalid because the parties are living together and, conversely, that it is invalid because his wife has abandoned him. A man has a continuing obligation to support his wife and children according to his means (Family Ct Act, §§ 412, 413) and in the absence of a pending matrimonial action, Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction of proceedings to compel support payments (Family Ct Act, § 411). The court may grant a support order when the parties are living together or apart, unless the wife has forfeited her right to support by abandoning her husband (see Levy v Levy, 22 AD2d 794). Petitioner asserted at oral argument that his wife had abandoned him and the children, but there is no evidence in the record that she has, and Family Court properly denied the motion to terminate support payments. We have considered the other points raised by petitioner and find them without merit. (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—support.) Present—Simons, J. P., Dillon, Hancock and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickering v. Pickering, 58 A.D.2d 1039, 397 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 1039 (Pickering v. Pickering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. Walsh
136 Misc. 2d 564 (NYC Family Court, 1987)
Venezia v. Venezia
135 Misc. 2d 708 (NYC Family Court, 1987)
Roseann R. v. William R.
119 Misc. 2d 874 (NYC Family Court, 1983)
Wiesenfeld v. State of NY
474 F. Supp. 1141 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Wiesenfeld v. New York
474 F. Supp. 1141 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Aurora G. v. Harold Aaron G.
98 Misc. 2d 695 (NYC Family Court, 1979)