Pickerell & Craig Co. v. Wholesale Co.
This text of 91 S.E. 353 (Pickerell & Craig Co. v. Wholesale Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbis ease was before us ¡á, a former term, 169 N. 0., 381. At tlie last trial, when the judgment from which this appeal is taken was rendered, the court seems to have followed the principles stated in the first appeal, and we see no substantial error in the case. The exceptions are taken mostly to questions of evidence, but neither party appears to have been really prejudiced by that which was admitted, or by any of the rulings. Young v. Mfg. Co., 151 N. C., 272. A fair opportunity was given to present the case on both sides, and we must decline to disturb the judgment.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 353, 173 N.C. 698, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickerell-craig-co-v-wholesale-co-nc-1917.