Picker v. Leavitt

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________



          No. 95-1912



                             PICKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.,



                                Plaintiff - Appellee,



                                          v.



                          BRUCE LEAVITT AND THOMAS J. QUINN,



                               Defendants - Appellants.



                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________



                            Cyr and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________



                                _____________________



               William  H.  West, with  whom  Stokes  & Bartholomew,  P.A.,
               _________________              ____________________________

          Richard C.  Heidlage and Heidlage & Reece, P.C. were on brief for
          ____________________     ______________________

          appellants.

               James  L.  Messenger, with  whom James  S. Dittmar,  Mark D.
               ____________________             _________________   _______

          Robins  and  Hutchins,  Wheeler  &  Dittmar  were  on  brief  for
          ______       ______________________________

          appellee.


____________________



                                   August 26, 1996

                                 ____________________



Per Curiam.  After a complete and careful evaluation of
                    Per Curiam.
                    __________



          the  record  in light  of the  positions  raised in  the parties'



          briefs  and at  oral  argument, we  affirm  the district  court's



          decision on substantially  the same basis  as that elucidated  in



          the district court's opinion.  Picker Internat'l Corp. v. Imaging
                                         _______________________    _______



          Equipment  Services, Inc., ___ F.  Supp. ___, 1995  WL 464918 (D.
          _________________________



          Mass. 1995).



                    Affirmed.
                    Affirmed
                    ________


-2-