Pickens v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Pickens v. Superior Court

267 P.2d 819, 42 Cal. 2d 873

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 1954

DocketSac. No. 6350

StatusPublished

This text of 267 P.2d 819 (Pickens v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickens v. Superior Court, 267 P.2d 819, 42 Cal. 2d 873 (Cal. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, ante, p. 399 [267 P.2d 801], are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. (See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341 [253 P.2d 673].)

Dooling, J. pro tem, sat in place of the Chief Justice, who deemed himself disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, ante, p. 399 [267 P.2d 801], are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. (See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341 [253 P.2d 673].)

Dooling, J. pro tem, sat in place of the Chief Justice, who deemed himself disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 P.2d 819, 42 Cal. 2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickens-v-superior-court-cal-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack