Pickens v. State

920 So. 2d 825, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2005, 2006 WL 358544
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 2006·No. No. 5D05-4520·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pickens sought appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, or in the alternative, review of the trial court’s denial of his request to file a second motion for post-conviction relief. However, Pickens admits he has no post-conviction relief motion pending in the court and the clerk of the lower court has found no order denying his request to file a second motion for post-conviction relief. Since there is no reviewable order rendered below, this court has no appellate jurisdiction to proceed in this matter.1

DISMISSED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickens v. State, 920 So. 2d 825, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2005, 2006 WL 358544 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 825 (Pickens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. State
920 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)