Pickens v. Oliver

392 U.S. 300, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 88 S. Ct. 2053, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1361
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1968·No. No. 1076·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pau-peris and the petition for a writ of certiorari, are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickens v. Oliver, 392 U.S. 300, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 88 S. Ct. 2053, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1361 (1968).

392 U.S. 300 (Pickens v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Washington
393 U.S. 898 (Supreme Court, 1968)