Pickens v. Oliver

Supreme Court

Pickens v. Oliver

392 U.S. 300, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 88 S. Ct. 2053, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1361

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 10, 1968

DocketNo. 1076

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 300 (Pickens v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickens v. Oliver, 392 U.S. 300, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 88 S. Ct. 2053, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1361 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pau-peris and the petition for a writ of certiorari, are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pau-peris and the petition for a writ of certiorari, are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 U.S. 300, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1105, 88 S. Ct. 2053, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickens-v-oliver-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack