Pickens v. NH DOC
This text of 2014 DNH 084 (Pickens v. NH DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pickens v. NH DOC 14-CV-028-SM 4/25/14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Ivan Mosi Pickens
v. Case No. 14-cv-28-SM Opinion No. 2014 DNH 084 William Wrenn, Commissioner of the NH Department of Corrections; Correctional Officer Oliver of the Northern Correctional Facility; Lieutenant J. Masse of the Northern Correctional Facility; and Employees John/Jane Does 1-10 of the Northern Correctional Facility
O R D E R
Plaintiff’s complaint (doc. no. 1) is before the court for
preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Without
prejudice to defendants’ right to file dispositive motions, the
court finds that plaintiff states cognizable claims over which
the court has jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the court directs service of the complaint on
defendants New Hampshire Department of Corrections Commissioner
William Wrenn, Northern Correctional Facility (“NCF”)
Correctional Officer Oliver, and NCF Lieutenant J. Masse. The
clerk’s office is directed to serve electronic copies of this
order and the complaint (doc. 1) on the New Hampshire Office of
the Attorney General (“AG”), as provided in the Agreement on
Acceptance of Service. Within thirty days from receipt of these materials, the AG
must submit an Acceptance of Service notice to the court
specifying whether all of the defendants have authorized the AG
to receive service on their behalf. When the AG files the
Acceptance of Service, service will be deemed made on the last
day of the thirty-day period for all defendants who accept AG
representation.
If defendants do not authorize the AG to receive service on
their behalf, or the AG declines to represent any or all of the
defendants, the AG shall, within thirty days from receipt of the
aforementioned materials, provide to the court the last known
address of those defendants. In that event, the clerk’s office
is instructed to complete and issue a summons for each of those
defendants, using the last known address provided, and forward
the summonses, along with copies of this order and the complaint
(doc. no. 1), to the United States Marshal for the District of
New Hampshire, to complete service on those defendants in
accordance with this order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) and 4(e).
Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead
within twenty-one days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(a)(1)(A). Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings,
written motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served
directly on the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials
2 to the defendants or their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 5(b).
Pickens may, within six (6) months of the date of this
order, unless otherwise allowed, amend his complaint to identify
the “John/Jane Doe” defendants. See Peñalbert–Rosa v.
Fortuña–Burset, 631 F.3d 592, 596–97 (1st Cir. 2011).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge
April 25, 2014
cc: Ivan Mosi Pickens, pro se
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 DNH 084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickens-v-nh-doc-nhd-2014.