Pickens v. NH DOC

2014 DNH 084
CourtDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire
DecidedApril 25, 2014
Docket14-CV-028-SM
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 DNH 084 (Pickens v. NH DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickens v. NH DOC, 2014 DNH 084 (D.N.H. 2014).

Opinion

Pickens v. NH DOC 14-CV-028-SM 4/25/14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ivan Mosi Pickens

v. Case No. 14-cv-28-SM Opinion No. 2014 DNH 084 William Wrenn, Commissioner of the NH Department of Corrections; Correctional Officer Oliver of the Northern Correctional Facility; Lieutenant J. Masse of the Northern Correctional Facility; and Employees John/Jane Does 1-10 of the Northern Correctional Facility

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s complaint (doc. no. 1) is before the court for

preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Without

prejudice to defendants’ right to file dispositive motions, the

court finds that plaintiff states cognizable claims over which

the court has jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the court directs service of the complaint on

defendants New Hampshire Department of Corrections Commissioner

William Wrenn, Northern Correctional Facility (“NCF”)

Correctional Officer Oliver, and NCF Lieutenant J. Masse. The

clerk’s office is directed to serve electronic copies of this

order and the complaint (doc. 1) on the New Hampshire Office of

the Attorney General (“AG”), as provided in the Agreement on

Acceptance of Service. Within thirty days from receipt of these materials, the AG

must submit an Acceptance of Service notice to the court

specifying whether all of the defendants have authorized the AG

to receive service on their behalf. When the AG files the

Acceptance of Service, service will be deemed made on the last

day of the thirty-day period for all defendants who accept AG

representation.

If defendants do not authorize the AG to receive service on

their behalf, or the AG declines to represent any or all of the

defendants, the AG shall, within thirty days from receipt of the

aforementioned materials, provide to the court the last known

address of those defendants. In that event, the clerk’s office

is instructed to complete and issue a summons for each of those

defendants, using the last known address provided, and forward

the summonses, along with copies of this order and the complaint

(doc. no. 1), to the United States Marshal for the District of

New Hampshire, to complete service on those defendants in

accordance with this order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) and 4(e).

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty-one days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(a)(1)(A). Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings,

written motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served

directly on the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials

2 to the defendants or their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 5(b).

Pickens may, within six (6) months of the date of this

order, unless otherwise allowed, amend his complaint to identify

the “John/Jane Doe” defendants. See Peñalbert–Rosa v.

Fortuña–Burset, 631 F.3d 592, 596–97 (1st Cir. 2011).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge

April 25, 2014

cc: Ivan Mosi Pickens, pro se

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penalbert-Rosa v. Fortuno-Burset
631 F.3d 592 (First Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 DNH 084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickens-v-nh-doc-nhd-2014.