Pickens v. Bayer Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pickens v. Bayer Corp.

36 A.3d 591, 614 Pa. 317, 2012 WL 284475, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 218

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 1, 2012

DocketNo. 122 EM 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 36 A.3d 591 (Pickens v. Bayer Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickens v. Bayer Corp., 36 A.3d 591, 614 Pa. 317, 2012 WL 284475, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 218 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exer[592]*592cise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exer[592]*592cise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.3d 591, 614 Pa. 317, 2012 WL 284475, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickens-v-bayer-corp-pa-2012.