Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Critcher v. Critcher

188 S.E. 313, 210 N.C. 779, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 226
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 25, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is error in the judgment dismissing this action. The judgment must be reversed on the authority of Green v. Green, ante, 147, 185 S. E., 651. In that case it is held that an infant appearing by its next friend can maintain an action against its father for support and maintenance, notwithstanding the bonds of matrimony between its father and mother have been dissolved by a judgment of divorce, and notwithstanding the infant is the illegitimate child of the father. It is said that there can be no controversy that the father is under a legal as well as a moral duty to support his infant child, and if he has the ability to do so, whether the child has property or not. There is a natural obligation to support even an illegitimate child which the law not only recognizes, but enforces.

This action was heard in the Superior Court before the opinion in Green v. Green, supra, was filed. The decision in that case is fully supported by the authorities cited in the opinion by Devin, J., and is determinative of the question presented by this appeal.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Critcher v. Critcher, 188 S.E. 313, 210 N.C. 779, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 226 (N.C. 1936).

188 S.E. 313 (Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Critcher v. Critcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Thomas
103 S.E.2d 371 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Mahan v. Read
83 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Bryant v. . Bryant
192 S.E. 864 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)