Pickell v. Commissioner

360 F. App'x 962
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2010
Docket08-72818
StatusUnpublished

This text of 360 F. App'x 962 (Pickell v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickell v. Commissioner, 360 F. App'x 962 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

*963 MEMORANDUM **

Dan Pickell appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his petition for relief from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s attempts to collect his federal income tax liabilities for tax years 2000 through 2008. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.

The tax court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because Pickell was never issued a “Notice of Determination” regarding the levies. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d). Contrary to Pickell’s arguments, the tax court properly determined that the Commissioner sent a final notice of intent to levy to Pickell’s last known address. See United States v. Zolla, 724 F.2d 808, 810 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Commissioner’s evidence of compliance with official mail procedures is sufficient to establish that notices were properly made).

Pickell’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Edward M. Zolla
724 F.2d 808 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
360 F. App'x 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickell-v-commissioner-ca9-2010.