Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

Ohio Supreme Court

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

917 N.E.2d 810, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1506

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 2009·No. 2009-1559·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 2009-Ohio-3483. Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 2009-Ohio-3483. Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray, 917 N.E.2d 810, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

917 N.E.2d 810 (Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related