Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

Ohio Supreme Court

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

917 N.E.2d 810, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1506

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 2009

Docket2009-1559

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 917 N.E.2d 810 (Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray, 917 N.E.2d 810, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 2009-Ohio-3483. Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 2009-Ohio-3483. Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

917 N.E.2d 810, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickaway-cty-skilled-gaming-llc-v-cordray-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack