Pickard v. Koenigstreuter

396 N.E.2d 484, 48 N.Y.2d 652, 421 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2267
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 18, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 396 N.E.2d 484 (Pickard v. Koenigstreuter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickard v. Koenigstreuter, 396 N.E.2d 484, 48 N.Y.2d 652, 421 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2267 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss the appeal herein granted and the appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the stipulation for judgment absolute, under the facts of this case, is illusory and frustrates the very purpose of CPLR 5601 (subd [c]) (Goldberg v Elkom Co., 36 NY2d 914).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. Elkom Co.
334 N.E.2d 600 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 N.E.2d 484, 48 N.Y.2d 652, 421 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickard-v-koenigstreuter-ny-1979.