Pickard v. H. G. Geratto, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pickard v. H. G. Geratto, Inc.

77 A.D.2d 760, 431 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 760 (Pickard v. H. G. Geratto, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickard v. H. G. Geratto, Inc., 77 A.D.2d 760, 431 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 16, 1979, which affirmed a compensation award to claimant based upon a 50% causally" related disability. The board found "on the basis of the probative medical evidence, and the testimony of Dr. Blauvelt, that claimant has a permanent partial causally related disability and that such disability results in a 50% earning capacity, thereby constituting a change in condition not contemplated when case was closed on schedule lump sum adjustment on November 14, 1974.” There is substantial evidence in the record which supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 16, 1979, which affirmed a compensation award to claimant based upon a 50% causally" related disability. The board found "on the basis of the probative medical evidence, and the testimony of Dr. Blauvelt, that claimant has a permanent partial causally related disability and that such disability results in a 50% earning capacity, thereby constituting a change in condition not contemplated when case was closed on schedule lump sum adjustment on November 14, 1974.” There is substantial evidence in the record which supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 760, 431 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickard-v-h-g-geratto-inc-nyappdiv-1980.