Pick v. Ketchum
This text of 73 Ill. 366 (Pick v. Ketchum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
We are unable to discover any grounds for the reversal of this judgment, in the several objections urged.
No exception was taken to the ruling of the court, in refusing to continue the cause on account of the absence of the witnesses, Prachor and Chadelc; and so far as the affidavits for a continuance on account of the sickness of appellant are concerned, it is sufficient that the record shows that he was, in fact, present and testified on the trial, and it does not appear that his evidence was less full and satisfactory than it would have been had the continuance been granted. Even, therefore, if there was error in this respect, it did not prejudice appellant.
The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Ill. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pick-v-ketchum-ill-1874.