Picinich v. State

894 So. 2d 1079, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2509, 2005 WL 475557
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 2005
DocketNo. 4D03-3690
StatusPublished

This text of 894 So. 2d 1079 (Picinich v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Picinich v. State, 894 So. 2d 1079, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2509, 2005 WL 475557 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in refusing to admit the results of a pre-trial polygraph examination, or to hold the state to a good faith standard for its refusal to stipulate to the test’s admission, see State v. Thompkins, 891 So.2d 1151, (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thompkins
891 So. 2d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 So. 2d 1079, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2509, 2005 WL 475557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picinich-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.