Pichilli v. Rodriguez

271 So. 3d 84
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2019·No. No. 3D18-0445·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Olave v. Howard, 547 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) ; Bessent v. Matthews, 543 So.2d 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). See also *85Panzera v. O'Neal, 198 So.3d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Byrd v. Leach, 226 So.2d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pichilli v. Rodriguez, 271 So. 3d 84 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

271 So. 3d 84 (Pichilli v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. Leach
226 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Bessent v. Matthews
543 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Olave v. Howard
547 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Penzera v. O'Neal
198 So. 3d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)