Pichel v. Fair Store Co.

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 612

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pichel v. Fair Store Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Ohio App. 322 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1928·No. No. 3196·Published

Opinion

[613]*613We are of opinion that there was sufficient evidence to show the good faith of the Company and the fairness of the contract; and, since it is not possible to restore to the Company the consideration received from it by Loth, we hold that the trial court was correct in rendering judgment against Loth’s estate.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court, will therefore be affirmed.

(Hamilton, PJ., and Cushing, J., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court, will therefore be affirmed.

(Hamilton, PJ., and Cushing, J., concur.)

Pichel v. Fair Store Co., 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 612 (Ohio Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 612 (Pichel v. Fair Store Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.