Picerne v. Sylvestre

315 A.2d 62, 112 R.I. 682
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 5, 1974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Motion to reargue granted.

Roberts, C. J. took no part in the consideration or decision of this case or the motion to reargue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Picerne v. Sylvestre, 315 A.2d 62, 112 R.I. 682 (R.I. 1974).

315 A.2d 62 (Picerne v. Sylvestre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Picerne v. Sylvestre
315 A.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1974)