Piccolo Club, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Piccolo Club, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

18 A.D.2d 658, 235 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 658 (Piccolo Club, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piccolo Club, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 18 A.D.2d 658, 235 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the New York State Liquor Authority canceling the restaurant liquor license of petitioner unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, without costs. Some of us are of the opinion that the penalty imposed was harsh. We are informed by the Authority, however, that the cancellation of a license does not preclude the making of an application for a new license after any specified period of time, as is the ease when a license is revoked (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 126, subd. 5, par. [a]). We assume the Authority advisedly did not revoke petitioner’s license, which would have the effect of foreclosing it from procuring a new license for at least two years. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the New York State Liquor Authority canceling the restaurant liquor license of petitioner unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, without costs. Some of us are of the opinion that the penalty imposed was harsh. We are informed by the Authority, however, that the cancellation of a license does not preclude the making of an application for a new license after any specified period of time, as is the ease when a license is revoked (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 126, subd. 5, par. [a]). We assume the Authority advisedly did not revoke petitioner’s license, which would have the effect of foreclosing it from procuring a new license for at least two years. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 658, 235 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piccolo-club-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack