Picciotto, Robin v. Sunny Meadows Foundation Safe Haven for Pets

2018 TN WC 78
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 5, 2018
Docket2016-08-1199
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 78 (Picciotto, Robin v. Sunny Meadows Foundation Safe Haven for Pets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Picciotto, Robin v. Sunny Meadows Foundation Safe Haven for Pets, 2018 TN WC 78 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Jun 05, 2018 02:38 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

ROBIN PICCIOTTO, ) Docket No. 2016-08-1199 Employee, ) v. ) SUNNY MEADOWS FOUNDATION ) State File No. 56767-2016 SAFE HAVEN FOR PETS, ) Employer, ) and ) STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL ) Judge Amber E. Luttrell INSURANCE CO., ) Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS

This matter came before the Court on May 17, 2018, for an Expedited Hearing on Ms. Picciotto’s request for temporary disability benefits. The legal issue is whether Ms. Picciotto is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in establishing entitlement to these benefits. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds Ms. Picciotto did not come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits and denies her request.

History of Claim 1

Ms. Picciotto worked for Sunny Meadows Foundation Safe Haven for Pets. On June 29, 2016, she stumbled and injured her right knee while walking a dog. Ms. Picciotto experienced immediate pain; however, she continued working. Her pain progressed over several days and she reported her injury. Sunny Meadows authorized an initial appointment at Baptist Urgent Care and then provided a panel from which Ms. Picciotto selected Dr. John Lochemes.

1 The hearing testimony and exhibits established the facts set forth in the History of Claim section. 1 Medical Treatment

Ms. Picciotto saw Dr. Lochemes on five occasions from August to October 2016, for what he diagnosed as a traumatic meniscus tear of the right knee. Dr. Lochemes treated Ms. Picciotto conservatively and assigned light duty restrictions of ten pounds continuous lifting, twenty-five pounds intermittent lifting, and no climbing, kneeling, bending, or stooping. Sunny Meadows could not accommodate those restrictions so it initiated temporary partial disability payments in August. 2 Throughout his treatment of her, Dr. Lochemes ordered an MRI of the knee that was repeatedly denied by Sunny Meadows.

Ms. Picciotto last saw Dr. Lochemes on October 18, 2016, because he left Memphis Orthopedic Group. At this visit, Dr. Lochemes again ordered an MRI and maintained light duty restrictions.

Sunny Meadows subsequently approved the knee MRI and provided Ms. Picciotto a new panel of orthopedic specialists from which she selected Dr. Anthony Mascioli. In April 2017, Dr. Mascioli noted the MRI confirmed a meniscus tear, and he recommended surgery.

Ms. Picciotto was unable to undergo knee surgery due to an unrelated eye condition diagnosed in the spring of 2017. 3 After extensive testing, she sought treatment from Dr. Kendrick Henderson, a neurologist, for a diagnosis of papilledema associated with increased intracranial pressure. During treatment for her unrelated condition, Dr. Henderson recommended Ms. Picciotto undergo a lumbar puncture before undergoing elective knee surgery with general anesthesia. Dr. Mascioli agreed and stated in a letter dated August 7, 2017, “I am aware of and agree that the knee surgery will need to be placed on hold until her neurology issues have been taken care of. Once she is cleared, we will be happy to get her on the surgery schedule for her knee injury.” She last saw Dr. Mascioli on December 19, 2017 when he again deferred knee surgery until Ms. Picciotto’s neurological issues were resolved. Dr. Mascioli’s records made no mention of her work status.

Because Ms. Picciotto could not proceed with knee surgery due to her unrelated condition Sunny Meadows suspended temporary disability payments awaiting Ms. Picciotto’s resumption of treatment for the knee injury.

2 The parties stipulated that Ms. Picciotto's compensation rate is $200.07 per week. 3 The parties introduced and the Court reviewed numerous medical records concerning Ms. Picciotto’s unrelated neurological condition from Church Health Center, Neurology Clinic, and Southern College of Optometry. Because the treatment details for that condition are irrelevant to the issue in this case, the Court did not address them in this order. 2 Hearing Testimony

Ms. Picciotto testified she has not returned to Dr. Mascioli for her knee injury since December 2017, but acknowledged she could because she remains under his care. She continues to see Dr. Henderson every three months for her neurological condition. Ms. Picciotto stated Dr. Henderson has no timeline or definite end date for her neurological/eye treatment and she agreed it is possible she may never have knee surgery.

Ms. Picciotto testified she has not worked since July 22, 2016. She stated that Dr. Mascioli has not released her at maximum medical improvement and told her to remain off work. 4 Ms. Picciotto does not think her eye condition prevents her from working, but “absolutely” believes her right knee prevents her from working. She requested back temporary disability from May 18, 2017 to present and ongoing temporary disability until such time she is able to resume treatment for her knee and reach maximum medical improvement from that treatment.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Picciotto need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, she must present sufficient evidence that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2017).

At the hearing, the parties submitted the issue in this case is whether Ms. Picciotto is entitled to temporary disability benefits when her treatment for the work injury was suspended indefinitely due to an unrelated medical condition. Ms. Picciotto argued Dr. Mascioli took her off work or restricted her from work until Dr. Henderson clears her to resume medical treatment and undergo knee surgery. She contended no exception exists to terminate temporary disability when an unrelated condition causes the suspension of medical treatment. Sunny Meadows argued Ms. Picciotto is not entitled to temporary disability benefits when her knee treatment was suspended for an indefinite period of time due to unrelated medical issues. It contended that to date, approximately one year later, Ms. Picciotto still has not resumed treatment for her knee injury and may never be able to proceed with the approved knee surgery due to her unrelated issue. Under these facts, Sunny Meadows asserted it would be unjust to indefinitely obligate it to continue temporary disability benefits.

Upon consideration of the evidence, the Court finds it need not address the issue 4 Ms. Picciotto provided somewhat different testimony regarding Dr. Mascioli’s instructions regarding work. She testified on direct examination that Dr. Mascioli “told her to stay off work,” but subsequently stated, “The parameters he said- they could not accommodate.” The Court understood Ms. Picciotto to say that Dr. Mascioli gave her restrictions Sunny Meadow could not accommodate. This variance does not affect the outcome of the Court’s holding. 3 raised by the parties at this time as Ms. Picciotto did not come forward with sufficient medical proof to satisfy the requirements for entitlement to temporary total or temporary partial disability benefits. An injured worker is eligible for temporary disability benefits if (1) the worker became disabled due to a compensable injury, (2) there is a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work, and (3) the worker established the duration of the period of disability. James v. Landair Transp., Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *16 (Aug. 26, 2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picciotto-robin-v-sunny-meadows-foundation-safe-haven-for-pets-tennworkcompcl-2018.