Picciolo v. Jones
This text of 509 So. 2d 984 (Picciolo v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully studied the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for both parties in Case No. 86-1126 and, having drawn every possible inference in favor of the non-moving party, we conclude that summary judgment was erroneously entered because there remain genuine issues of material fact. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979); Holl v. Talcott, [985]*985191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Shaffran v. Holness, 93 So.2d 94 (Fla.1957); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment appealed and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent herewith. In light of our disposition we need not address the remaining points raised in this consolidated appeal.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1715, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picciolo-v-jones-fladistctapp-1987.