Piccinini v. DiNapoli

68 A.D.3d 1212, 889 N.Y.2d 730
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1212 (Piccinini v. DiNapoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piccinini v. DiNapoli, 68 A.D.3d 1212, 889 N.Y.2d 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Mercure, J.

In October 2005, petitioner was injured when he tripped oh an uneven section of sidewalk while performing a routine patrol in his capacity as a security service assistant for the State University of New York Police Department. After his application for accidental disability retirement benefits was disapproved, he requested a redetermination and a hearing was held. The Hearing Officer concluded that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 and denied petitioner’s application. Respondent adopted the Hearing Officer’s findings, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Inasmuch as “injuries that arise out of an employee’s own misstep or inattention will not merit an accidental disability determination” (Matter of Magrino v DiNapoli, 64 AD3d 868, 869 [1213]*1213[2009]), we now confirm. Here, petitioner admitted that he patrolled the sector in which he fell on a regular basis. Moreover, although the incident occurred at approximately 1:00 a.m., petitioner acknowledged that there were lights in the area and that, having worked on the campus for almost seven years, he was “very familiar” with the sidewalks. Accordingly, we perceive no basis on which to disturb respondent’s determination that petitioner’s injury was not the result of “a sudden and extraordinary event that [was] unrelated to the ordinary risks of [his] employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]).

Cardona, RJ., Spain, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Loia v. DiNapoliI
2018 NY Slip Op 5984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Manning v. DiNapoli
2017 NY Slip Op 3591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
MatterofScarsellivNewYorkStateandLocalPoliceandFireRetirementSystem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Scarselli v. New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement System
121 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Madaffari v. DiNapoli
104 A.D.3d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Assmann v. DiNapoli
95 A.D.3d 1487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Claim of Chilelli v. DiNapoli
91 A.D.3d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Dilello v. DiNapoli
83 A.D.3d 1361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1212, 889 N.Y.2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piccinini-v-dinapoli-nyappdiv-2009.