Picciano v. Conrad

65 A.D.2d 586, 409 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13246

This text of 65 A.D.2d 586 (Picciano v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Picciano v. Conrad, 65 A.D.2d 586, 409 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

In an action for the repayment of a loan and for moneys had and received, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 16, 1977, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On the present record the motion for summary judgment was properly granted since the claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The alleged partial payment of $50 (by a money order) was never "made and accepted” (see Morris Demolition Co. v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 516, 521), in that plaintiff’s son returned the money order with a letter describing it as "totally unacceptable to Mom.” Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of Education
355 N.E.2d 369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A.D.2d 586, 409 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picciano-v-conrad-nyappdiv-1978.