Picciano v. Clark County
This text of Picciano v. Clark County (Picciano v. Clark County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 GAVEN PICCIANO, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06106-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS PARTY WELLPATH (DKT. NO. 181) 13 CLARK COUNTY, CLARK COUNTY JAIL, WELLPATH, LLC, and 14 NAPHCARE, INC., 15 Defendant. 16
17 Plaintiff Gaven Picciano and Defendant Wellpath, LLC (“Wellpath”) jointly move 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) to dismiss with prejudice only those claims 19 against Wellpath and without costs to either party. (Dkt. No. 181 at 1) (citing Gen. Signal Corp. 20 v. MCI Telecommc’ns Corp., 66 F.3d 1500, 1513 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Rule 41 is reserved for 21 circumstances in which the result of the alleged dismissal is that one or all of the defendants are 22 released from the action.”). 23 The motion (Dkt. No. 181) is GRANTED and Wellpath is hereby DISMISSED from the 24 case with prejudice. 1 2 Dated this 27th day of June, 2025. 3 a 4 David G. Estudillo 5 United States District Judge
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Picciano v. Clark County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picciano-v-clark-county-wawd-2025.