Picariello v. Linares & Rescigno Bank

23 A.2d 396, 127 N.J.L. 565, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 9, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal- — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Picariello v. Linares & Rescigno Bank, 23 A.2d 396, 127 N.J.L. 565, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1942).

23 A.2d 396 (Picariello v. Linares & Rescigno Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doherty v. Trenton Trust Co.
126 A.2d 899 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)