Picarella, Jr., C. v. Mason, B.
This text of Picarella, Jr., C. v. Mason, B. (Picarella, Jr., C. v. Mason, B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CHARLES PICARELLA JR., : No. 165 MM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERINTENDENT B. MASON, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2020, the Application for Extraordinary
Relief is DENIED, and the “Application for Leave to File for Extension of Time Nunc Pro
Tunc” and the Motion for Leave to Amend are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Picarella, Jr., C. v. Mason, B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picarella-jr-c-v-mason-b-pa-2020.