Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.

642 So. 2d 862, 1994 La. LEXIS 2315
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 30, 1994·No. No. 94-CC-1555·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Picard, Roy; Picard, Tammy; Security Life Ins. Co.; Frederick, Cleve & Tank Co. Inc.; Cleve Frederick & Son Tank Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86,203; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2242.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment is reinstated. See Malloy v. Bryan E. Talbot Contractor, Inc., 94-1148 (La. 7/1/94); 639 So.2d 1181 (La.1994); Hanks v. Shell Oil Co., 94-0483 (La. 4/4/94); 635 So.2d 1118 (La.1994); Moore v. Crystal Oil Co., 93-3103 (La. 2/5/94); 632 So.2d 758 (La.1994). Case re[863]*863manded to the district court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., and HALL, J., would grant the writ and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., 642 So. 2d 862, 1994 La. LEXIS 2315 (La. 1994).

642 So. 2d 862 (Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loflin v. International Paper Co.
793 So. 2d 533 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)