Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.

642 So. 2d 862, 1994 La. LEXIS 2315

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

DocketNo. 94-CC-1555

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 642 So. 2d 862 (Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., 642 So. 2d 862, 1994 La. LEXIS 2315 (La. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Picard, Roy; Picard, Tammy; Security Life Ins. Co.; Frederick, Cleve & Tank Co. Inc.; Cleve Frederick & Son Tank Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86,203; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2242.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment is reinstated. See Malloy v. Bryan E. Talbot Contractor, Inc., 94-1148 (La. 7/1/94); 639 So.2d 1181 (La.1994); Hanks v. Shell Oil Co., 94-0483 (La. 4/4/94); 635 So.2d 1118 (La.1994); Moore v. Crystal Oil Co., 93-3103 (La. 2/5/94); 632 So.2d 758 (La.1994). Case re[863]*863manded to the district court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., and HALL, J., would grant the writ and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Picard, Roy; Picard, Tammy; Security Life Ins. Co.; Frederick, Cleve & Tank Co. Inc.; Cleve Frederick & Son Tank Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86,203; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2242.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment is reinstated. See Malloy v. Bryan E. Talbot Contractor, Inc., 94-1148 (La. 7/1/94); 639 So.2d 1181 (La.1994); Hanks v. Shell Oil Co., 94-0483 (La. 4/4/94); 635 So.2d 1118 (La.1994); Moore v. Crystal Oil Co., 93-3103 (La. 2/5/94); 632 So.2d 758 (La.1994). Case re[863]*863manded to the district court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., and HALL, J., would grant the writ and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 So. 2d 862, 1994 La. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picard-v-zeit-exploration-co-la-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack