Picalas v. United States

33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2866
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 1929
DocketNo. 2792
StatusPublished

This text of 33 F.2d 1022 (Picalas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Picalas v. United States, 33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2866 (4th Cir. 1929).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The majority of the court are of the opinion that this ease cannot be distinguished in principle from the ease of Isner v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 8 F.(2d) 487, and that consequently the portions of the charge complained of constituted reversible error. The principles of law involved were clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Webb, speaking for this court, in the Isner Case. That decision has never been overruled, and must be followed as the law applicable in such eases. The judgment of the District Court will accordingly be reversed, and the case will be remanded for a new trial.

Reversed.

McCLINTIC, District Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isner v. United States
8 F.2d 487 (Fourth Circuit, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picalas-v-united-states-ca4-1929.