Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan

683 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918, 1996 WL 710826
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1332
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 So. 2d 676 (Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan, 683 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918, 1996 WL 710826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We reverse the summary judgment in favor of appellees because the record indicates [677]*677a factual dispute as to appellees’ ownership of the subject property during the time period for which they seek recovery of rents. See Jordan v. Sayre, 24 Fla. 1, 3 So. 329 (1888); Oakland Properties, Corp. v. Hogan, 96 Fla. 40, 117 So. 846 (1928); Ormond Beach Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Citation Mortgage, Ltd., 634 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

REVERSED.

POLEN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenberg v. Hall, Dickler, Kent, Friedman, & Wood, L.L.P.
718 So. 2d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918, 1996 WL 710826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pic-morris-inc-v-isfan-fladistctapp-1996.