Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan
683 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918, 1996 WL 710826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1996·No. No. 95-1332·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the summary judgment in favor of appellees because the record indicates [677]*677a factual dispute as to appellees’ ownership of the subject property during the time period for which they seek recovery of rents. See Jordan v. Sayre, 24 Fla. 1, 3 So. 329 (1888); Oakland Properties, Corp. v. Hogan, 96 Fla. 40, 117 So. 846 (1928); Ormond Beach Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Citation Mortgage, Ltd., 634 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan, 683 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12918, 1996 WL 710826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 676 (Pic-Morris, Inc. v. Isfan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greenberg v. Hall, Dickler, Kent, Friedman, & Wood, L.L.P.
718 So. 2d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)