Piatt v. Town of Hillsboro

212 N.C. 835
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1938·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiff seeks to recover upon tbe principle announced in White Co. v. Hickory, 195 N. C., 42, 141 S. E., 494. But as tbe jury has found tbat be bolds no valid contract witb tbe defendant, bis action fails. Realty Co. v. Charlotte, 198 N. C., 564, 152 S. E., 686. Tbis ends tbe matter, even though tbe issues submitted, over objection, may not meet witb entire approval.

Tbe result'will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piatt v. Town of Hillsboro, 212 N.C. 835 (N.C. 1938).

212 N.C. 835 (Piatt v. Town of Hillsboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbott Realty Co. v. City of Charlotte
152 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Gilbert C. White Co. v. City of Hickory
141 S.E. 494 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)