Piatt v. Heirs of St. Clair
5 Ohio 555
Opinion
It is safest to make the appointment. It has always been held -that to charge a decedent’s estate with his debts, there must be a ■personal representative to proceed against. We are not willing to make a new precedent. The cause will be continued that the ap,;pointment may be made, and the party brought before the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Piatt v. Heirs of St. Clair, 5 Ohio 555 (Ohio 1832).
5 Ohio 555 (Piatt v. Heirs of St. Clair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. Musler
1 Disney (Ohio) 36 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1855)
Matoon v. Heirs & Administrators of Clapp
8 Ohio 248 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1837)