Piacentino v. Long Island Rail Road

12 A.D.2d 923, 211 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12396

This text of 12 A.D.2d 923 (Piacentino v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piacentino v. Long Island Rail Road, 12 A.D.2d 923, 211 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this death action, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the [924]*924verdicts as modified vacated, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, it not appearing that the witness Libertoff was so situated that in the ordinary course of events he would have heard any warning signal originating from the train (cf. Latourelle v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 301 N. Y. 103, 108). Some members of the court believe the amounts of the verdicts as modified were excessive, but it is not necessary to reach that question. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latourelle v. New York Central Railroad
92 N.E.2d 911 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.D.2d 923, 211 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piacentino-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1961.