Pia McAdams v. Nationstar Mortgage
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1087 Doc: 66 Filed: 02/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
FILED: February 10, 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1087
PIA MCADAMS,
Appellant,
v.
DEMETRIUS ROBINSON; TAMARA ROBINSON,
Plaintiffs – Appellees,
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,
Defendant – Appellee.
-------------------------------
NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER; MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC., CONSUMERS LEAGUE OF NEW JERSEY; CONNECTICUT FAIR HOUSING CENTER; NORTHWEST CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Amici Supporting Appellant.
ORDER
The Court amends its opinion filed on February 10, 2022, as follows:
Subsections A and B are added to sections I and III.
On page 3, in the last line of the first paragraph under section I.A., the word
“complete” is changed to “process.” USCA4 Appeal: 21-1087 Doc: 66 Filed: 02/10/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
On page 6, in the first full paragraph, the second sentence is changed to read, “The
judge found that the distribution of the notice was sufficient because over 97% of the nearly
350,000 class members received notice.”
On page 15, in the second line under section IV, the words “district court” are
changed to “magistrate judge.”
On page 17, the first sentence under section V now reads, “McAdams also argues
that the settlement release is ‘ambiguous, overbroad, and beyond the permissible scope of
release for class action settlements.’”
On page 18, in the fifth line up from the bottom of the page, the word “the” is
inserted before “class action.”
For the Court – By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pia McAdams v. Nationstar Mortgage (Pia McAdams v. Nationstar Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.