Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics Research LLC v. Yeak

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided January 12, 2022·No. 4:20-cv-00379·Unknown

Opinion

WO

Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics No. CV-20-00379-TUC-JCH Research LLC, Plaintiff, v. Jeremy Yeak, et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Amended and Revised Protective Order (Doc. 41) filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). On May 28, 2021, this Court entered a Protective Order to protect the parties’ confidential and proprietary information and assist the flow of discovery. (Doc. 21.) Parties seek to amend the Protective Order, specifically to “prevent disclosure of competitively sensitive information to an opposing expert that would have a conflict of interest or otherwise risk unauthorized disclosure (whether consciously or otherwise) and creating another tier of protections for each party’s very most competitively sensitive information.” (Doc. 41 at 2.) Upon review, the Court finds good cause exists to protect the Parties’ confidential and proprietary information and assist the flow of discovery. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Joint Motion (Doc. 41). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ENTERING the following Amended Protective Order: AMENDED AND REVISED PROTECTIVE ORDER A. The term “Confidential Information” will mean and include information contained or disclosed in any Materials (as defined in the next paragraph), including documents, portions of documents, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, trial testimony, deposition testimony, and transcripts of trial testimony and depositions, including data, summaries, and compilations derived therefrom that is deemed to be Confidential Information by any party to which it belongs. B. The term “Materials” will include, but is not be limited to: documents; correspondence; memoranda; financial information; email; specifications; marketing plans; marketing budgets; customer information; materials that identify customers or potential customers; price lists or schedules or other matter identifying pricing; minutes; letters; statements; cancelled checks; contracts; invoices; drafts; books of account; worksheets; forecasts; notes of conversations; desk diaries; appointment books; expense accounts; recordings; photographs; motion pictures; sketches; drawings; notes of discussions with third parties; other notes; business reports; instructions; disclosures; other writings; records of website development (except those publicly available); and internet archives (except those publicly available). C. The term “Counsel” will mean all counsel for either party throughout the litigation, including outside counsel in this case, in-house counsel, and other attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, and support staff employed in the office of any counsel of record, and any jury consultants. D. The term “independent expert” will mean any expert retained by counsel, who is not employed by or otherwise affiliated or associated with the parties for purposes other than this action. E. The term “disclosures,” when referring to an expert, will mean a detailed education and employment history of the expert, which shall include at least (i) an up-to- - 2 - date curriculum vitae of the expert; (ii) any previous or current relationship with any of the parties to this action; (iii) a list of cases in which the expert has been involved in within the last five (5) years; and (iv) a list of all companies for which the expert has consulted or by which the expert has been employed within the last ten (10) years, the dates of the consultancy or employment, and a brief description of the subject matter of the consultancy or employment. F. The term “secure online data room” will mean any file storage service accessible by the Internet that is under the control of the producing party, which must, at a minimum, be protected by login credentials assigned to individual users, and may have additional restrictions with respect to downloading and/or copying at the election of the producing party. The following provisions shall apply in this litigation: 1. Each party to this litigation that produces or discloses any Materials, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, trial testimony, deposition testimony, and transcripts of trial testimony and depositions, or information that the producing party believes should be subject to this Protective Order may designate the same as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY.” (a) Designation as “CONFIDENTIAL”: Any party may designate information as “CONFIDENTIAL” only if, in the good faith belief of such party and its Counsel, the unrestricted disclosure of such information could be harmful to the business or operations of such party. (b) Designation as “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY”: Any party may designate information as “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY” only if, in the good faith belief of such party and its Counsel, the information is among that considered to be most - 3 - sensitive by the party, including but not limited to trade secret or other confidential research, development, financial, customer related data or other commercial information. 2. In the event the producing party elects to produce Materials for a physical inspection or for inspection in a secure online data room, no marking need be made by the producing party in advance of the initial inspection. For purposes of the initial inspection, all Materials produced will be considered as “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY,” and must be treated as such pursuant to the terms of this Order. Thereafter, upon selection of specified Materials for copying (“selected materials”) by the inspecting party, the producing party must, within a reasonable time prior to producing those Materials to the inspecting party, mark the copies of those Materials that contain Confidential Information with the appropriate confidentiality marking. The inspecting party shall maintain a log of all hard copies of all such selected materials that include the location and the name of the custodian of each and every hard copy. Upon three (3) day’s advance notice to the inspecting party by the producing party, the inspecting party shall provide a copy of this log to the producing party. 3. Whenever a deposition taken on behalf of any party involves the disclosure of Confidential Information of any party: (a) the deposition or portions of the deposition must be designated as containing Confidential Information subject to the provisions of this Order; such designation must be made on the record whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as containing Confidential Information after transcription of the proceedings; a party will have until thirty (30) days after receipt of the deposition transcript to inform the other party or parties to the action - 4 - of the portions of the transcript to be designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY.” (b) the disclosing party will have the right to exclude from attendance at the deposition, during such time as the Confidential Information is to be disclosed, any person other than the deponent, Counsel (including their staff and associates), the court reporter, and the person(s) agreed upon pursuant to paragraph 8, below; and (c) The originals of the deposition transcripts and all copies of the deposition must bear the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY,” as appropriate, and the original or any copy ultimately presented to a court for filing must not be filed unless it can be accomplished under seal, identified as being subject to this Order, and protected from being opened except by order of this Court. 4. All Confidential Information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY” must not be disclosed by the receiving party to anyone other than those persons designated within this Order and must be handled in the manner set forth belo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics Research LLC v. Yeak, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics Research LLC v. Yeak (Physics, Materials, and Applied Mathematics Research LLC v. Yeak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)