Physicians Health Care Plans, Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration
This text of 706 So. 2d 113 (Physicians Health Care Plans, Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL '
This is an appeal from a final administrative order denying a petition to initiate rule-making. The appellant, Physicians Health Care Plans, Inc., contends that section 409.9124, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996) requires the Agency for Health Care Administration to adopt a rule defining the methodology for reimbursement of managed care plans.1 This argument was rejected by the agency but on January 2, 1998, approximately one week before the oral argument in this appeal, the agency initiated a proceeding under section 120.54(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996), to develope a proposed rule on the same subject. Then on January 5, 1998, the agency sought to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it had been rendered moot by the pending rulemaking proceeding.
We agree with appellant that section 409.9124 expressly requires the agency to “develop and adopt by rule a methodology for reimbursing managed care plans.” The agency candidly acknowledges that it is not a coincidence that the proposed rule development was initiated shortly prior to the date of oral argument. Further, we understand appellant’s complaint with the agency’s delay in initiating the rulemaking required by section 409.9124. According to section 120.54(l)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996),2 the agency was required to draft and formally propose a rule within 180 days' of. the effective date of section 409.9124, or by December 30,1996.3 Nevertheless, because the [114]*114appellant’s proposed rule, filed as a part of its petition below, can be considered by the agency in the newly instituted rule development proceeding, the agency’s belated initiation of rulemaking grants the appellant all relief that would be presently available here.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot. The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek reinstatement of this appeal should the agency abandon the present rulemaking proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 113, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1639, 1998 WL 69097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/physicians-health-care-plans-inc-v-state-agency-for-health-care-fladistctapp-1998.