Physicians for Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Defense
Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
* PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No.: RDB-08-273 v. * U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., *
Defendants. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, IT IS this 30th day of
December, 2009, HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 15) is GRANTED and
Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 16) is DENIED with
respect to the adequacy of the search conducted by each Defendant, except with
respect to the search conducted by CENTCOM;
2. Defendants’ motion is DENIED and Plaintiff’s cross-motion is GRANTED with
respect to the adequacy of the search conducted by CENTCOM;
a. Not later than April 1, 2010, CENTCOM shall: (i) conduct a new search for
responsive documents generated from November 1, 2001, until the start date
of its new search; (ii) produce all responsive and non-exempt information
obtained in this new search; and (iii) submit a renewed motion for summary
judgment and any supporting affidavits on this issue. Plaintiff’s opposition
thereto and cross-motion for summary judgment, if any, shall be filed by not later than April 30, 2010. Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s cross-motion,
if any, and reply in support of its motion for summary judgment shall be filed
by not later than May 21, 2010. Plaintiff’s reply in support of its cross-motion
for summary judgment, if any, shall be filed by not later than June 11, 2010.
3. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s cross-motion is DENIED with
respect to the withholdings claimed by each Defendant, except with respect to the
withholdings claimed by the Joint Staff and the DIA;
4. A ruling is DEFERRED with respect to the withholdings claimed by the Joint Staff
and the DIA;
a. Not later than February 1, 2010, the Joint Staff and the DIA shall submit the
un-redacted copies of their responsive documents to this Court for in camera
review;
5. Copies of this Order and the foregoing Memorandum Opinion shall be transmitted to
counsel of record.
/s/_______________________ Richard D. Bennett United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Physicians for Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Defense (Physicians for Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.