Phuter v. . Gunder

1 N.C. 791
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 791 (Phuter v. . Gunder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phuter v. . Gunder, 1 N.C. 791 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

The plaintiff declared quod cum the defendant's husband was indebted to him £ 42, and made her executrix, and died; she proved the will, and the plaintiff having told her he meant to sue her, she, in consideration of forbearance until such a day, promised to pay him. He avers the forbearance, and says she did not pay. And although he did not show wherefore the testator was indebted to him, the declaration was adjudged *well. For here the debt is only an inducement. 5 H., 7, 1; 21 H., 7, 15; 9 E., 4, 41. Aliter, if the promise creates the debt.

2. It is not averred that no part of the debt is paid. Sed nonallocatur, for the breach is alleged according to the promise, and judgment was given accordingly. Hob., 83.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phuter-v-gunder-kingsbench-1793.