Phuc Van Tran v. United States

677 F. App'x 111
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 21, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7243
StatusPublished

This text of 677 F. App'x 111 (Phuc Van Tran v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phuc Van Tran v. United States, 677 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phuc Van Tran, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition as an improper § 2241 petition and/or an unauthorized second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tran’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tran has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant Tran’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motion to appoint coun[112]*112sel, and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 F. App'x 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phuc-van-tran-v-united-states-ca4-2017.