Photography is Not a Crime v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Photography is Not a Crime v. State

166 So. 3d 236, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9979, 2015 WL 3986158

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 1, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-3005

StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 3d 236 (Photography is Not a Crime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Photography is Not a Crime v. State, 166 So. 3d 236, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9979, 2015 WL 3986158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners Photography is Not a Crime (“PINAC”) and Michale Hoffman seek review of an order of the circuit court rendered in its appellate capacity. That order had the effect of denying a petition for review of a county court order denying PINAC’s request to undertake video coverage of Mr. Hoffman’s trial in a pending misdemeanor case. The circuit court found and petitioners concede that they have not made application for authorization to engage in this activity in accordance with a recent administrative order of the circuit court providing a process for the issuance of credentials to non-traditional media outlets to provide electronic coverage of cases such as Mr. Hoffman’s. We reject petitioners’ contention that it would be futile to even make such an application, and therefore conclude that the circuit court’s ruling was not a departure from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ.,.concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners Photography is Not a Crime (“PINAC”) and Michale Hoffman seek review of an order of the circuit court rendered in its appellate capacity. That order had the effect of denying a petition for review of a county court order denying PINAC’s request to undertake video coverage of Mr. Hoffman’s trial in a pending misdemeanor case. The circuit court found and petitioners concede that they have not made application for authorization to engage in this activity in accordance with a recent administrative order of the circuit court providing a process for the issuance of credentials to non-traditional media outlets to provide electronic coverage of cases such as Mr. Hoffman’s. We reject petitioners’ contention that it would be futile to even make such an application, and therefore conclude that the circuit court’s ruling was not a departure from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ.,.concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 3d 236, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9979, 2015 WL 3986158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/photography-is-not-a-crime-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.