Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe

City of New York Municipal Court

Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe

20 Misc. 698, 46 N.Y.S. 678

CourtCity of New York Municipal Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 Misc. 698 (Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe, 20 Misc. 698, 46 N.Y.S. 678 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

The plaintiff is a foreign corporation and can only act by its representative or agent.

This verification is clearly defective and may be treated as a nullity.

Defendant then had a right to disregard this verification and serve an unverified answer. This is perfectly proper and regular.

Order is reversed and plaintiff is compelled to accept the. defendant’s unverified answer without conditions.

Yah Wyck, Ch. J., and Schuchmah, J., concur.

Order reversed and plaintiff compelled to accept defendant’s unverified answer, without conditions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI