Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe
20 Misc. 698, 46 N.Y.S. 678
Opinion
The plaintiff is a foreign corporation and can only act by its representative or agent.
This verification is clearly defective and may be treated as a nullity.
Defendant then had a right to disregard this verification and serve an unverified answer. This is perfectly proper and regular.
Order is reversed and plaintiff is compelled to accept the. defendant’s unverified answer without conditions.
Yah Wyck, Ch. J., and Schuchmah, J., concur.
Order reversed and plaintiff compelled to accept defendant’s unverified answer, without conditions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe, 20 Misc. 698, 46 N.Y.S. 678 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).
20 Misc. 698 (Phonoharp Co. v. Stobbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crimmins v. Polhemus
189 Misc. 183 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1947)
Beglin v. People's Trust Co.
95 N.Y.S. 910 (New York County Courts, 1905)
Beglin v. People's Trust Co.
48 Misc. 494 (Kings County Court, 1905)