Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

18 A.3d 1093, 610 Pa. 203, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1022
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 27, 2011
Docket517 EAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.3d 1093 (Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 18 A.3d 1093, 610 Pa. 203, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1022 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Did the Commonwealth Court err and misinterpret the meaning of § 306(b)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 512(2)[,] in determining that a job is available to a claimant for purposes of said Act even when a claimant applies to each individual job contained *204 in a labor market survey and does not receive an offer of employment?
b. Did the Commonwealth Court err in failing to remand the matter to the Workers’ Compensation Judge for a determination of whether or not the jobs identified by the employer’s vocational expert were open and available in light of the fact that the holding of the Commonwealth Court in the within matter altered the status of the law at the time of the decision rendered by the Workers’ Compensation Judge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
81 A.3d 830 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.3d 1093, 610 Pa. 203, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenixville-hospital-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2011.