Phoenix Mutual Line Insurance v. Conway
This text of 15 A.D.2d 924 (Phoenix Mutual Line Insurance v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In our opinion, defendants’ failure to bring an action within the seven-month period after plaintiff notified them of its intention to rescind the policy on the ground of fraud, constituted a waiver of their right to a jury trial (Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Haney, 163 Misc. 179; American Life Ins. Co. v. Stewart, 300 U. S. 203). We are also of the opinion that under the circumstances here, since the action for rescission was commenced first, it should be tried first (Wolff v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York, 154 Misc. 431, affd. 241 App. Div. 869; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Marcin, 164 Misc. 781). Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 924, 225 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-mutual-line-insurance-v-conway-nyappdiv-1962.