Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark

62 N.H. 700
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1883·Published

Opinion

Debt, on a bond. The referee reported the amount legally due, the amount equitably due, and all facts proved before him bearing <on the questions of legal and equitable indebtedness, as directed in 59 N. H. 561, 562. Both parties moved for judgment, the plaintiffs for the penal sum of the bond, and the defendant, because on the facts reported nothing was legally or equitably due on the bond. The plaintiffs’ motion was granted.

Allen and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883).

62 N.H. 700 (Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. Clark
59 N.H. 561 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)