Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark

62 N.H. 700

DecidedJune 5, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 700 (Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Clark, 62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Debt, on a bond. The referee reported the amount legally due, the amount equitably due, and all facts proved before him bearing <on the questions of legal and equitable indebtedness, as directed in 59 N. H. 561, 562. Both parties moved for judgment, the plaintiffs for the penal sum of the bond, and the defendant, because on the facts reported nothing was legally or equitably due on the bond. The plaintiffs’ motion was granted.

Allen and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debt, on a bond. The referee reported the amount legally due, the amount equitably due, and all facts proved before him bearing <on the questions of legal and equitable indebtedness, as directed in 59 N. H. 561, 562. Both parties moved for judgment, the plaintiffs for the penal sum of the bond, and the defendant, because on the facts reported nothing was legally or equitably due on the bond. The plaintiffs’ motion was granted.

Allen and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-mutual-life-ins-co-v-clark-nh-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack