Phoenix Exploration, Inc. v. Murexco Petroleum, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Phoenix Exploration, Inc. v. Murexco Petroleum, Inc.

614 So. 2d 72, 1993 WL 78097

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 19, 1993

DocketNo. 93-CC-0444

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 72 (Phoenix Exploration, Inc. v. Murexco Petroleum, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phoenix Exploration, Inc. v. Murexco Petroleum, Inc., 614 So. 2d 72, 1993 WL 78097 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Imel, Robert A.; — Third Party(ies); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2364; Parish of Pointe Coupee, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 26,375.

Granted. Since relator had filed bankruptcy proceedings at the time of the contempt hearing and his attorney advised him that it would be unnecessary for him to appear at the hearing due to the automatic stay (even though this stay was later retroactively lifted), the ruling of the trial judge finding relator in contempt is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Stay recalled.

DENNIS, J., would grant and docket the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Imel, Robert A.; — Third Party(ies); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2364; Parish of Pointe Coupee, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 26,375.

Granted. Since relator had filed bankruptcy proceedings at the time of the contempt hearing and his attorney advised him that it would be unnecessary for him to appear at the hearing due to the automatic stay (even though this stay was later retroactively lifted), the ruling of the trial judge finding relator in contempt is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Stay recalled.

DENNIS, J., would grant and docket the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 72, 1993 WL 78097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-exploration-inc-v-murexco-petroleum-inc-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack