Phoenix Construction Co. v. STEAMER POUGHKEEPSIE & C.
212 U.S. 558
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 30, 1908
Docket401
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 212 U.S. 558 (Phoenix Construction Co. v. STEAMER POUGHKEEPSIE & C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Phoenix Construction Co. v. STEAMER POUGHKEEPSIE & C., 212 U.S. 558 (1908).
Opinion
THE PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
v.
THE STEAMER POUGHKEEPSIE & c. AND THE STEAMER HOMER RAMSDELL & c. CENTRAL HUDSON STEAMBOAT COMPANY, CLAIMANT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. E. Crosby Kindelberger for libellant appellant.
Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for claimant appellee.
No. 401, Motion to dismiss or affirm.
Per Curiam:
Decree affirmed with costs. Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Company v. Cleveland Steamship Company, 208 U.S. 316; The Troy, 208 U.S. 321.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mitchell Navarre v. Prosper Operators, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021
AGIP Petroleum Co. v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.
920 F. Supp. 1330 (S.D. Texas, 1996)
Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law
404 U.S. 202 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
395 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1969)
The Raithmoor
241 U.S. 166 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
212 U.S. 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-construction-co-v-steamer-poughkeepsie-c-scotus-1908.