Phoenix Bank v. Stafford

New York Supreme Court

Phoenix Bank v. Stafford

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 243

DecidedJanuary 15, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 243 (Phoenix Bank v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phoenix Bank v. Stafford, 33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 243 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted by inserting in the order of reversal the words “ on questions of fact,” on payment by plaintiff of ten dollars costs of opposing, and on condition that if the defendants elect within ten dajs to discontinue their appeal to the Court of Appeals (which they are hereby permitted to do, without costs, in case the plaintiff avails himself of the relief granted by this order) the plaintiff pay to the defendants their costs and disbursements incurred in the prosecution of said appeal to this time, and if said condition be not complied with the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs of opposing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted by inserting in the order of reversal the words “ on questions of fact,” on payment by plaintiff of ten dollars costs of opposing, and on condition that if the defendants elect within ten dajs to discontinue their appeal to the Court of Appeals (which they are hereby permitted to do, without costs, in case the plaintiff avails himself of the relief granted by this order) the plaintiff pay to the defendants their costs and disbursements incurred in the prosecution of said appeal to this time, and if said condition be not complied with the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs of opposing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phoenix-bank-v-stafford-nysupct-1882.