Phoenix Apartments, Inc. v. Edgewater Park Sewerage Authority
444 A.2d 51, 89 N.J. 2, 1982 N.J. LEXIS 1884
Opinion
We affirm the judgment below substantially on the basis of so much of the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 178 N.J.Super. 109 (1981), as determines the validity of the classification of rate schedule. In so doing, we intimate no view on the admissibility of the rent rolls under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Evid. R. 63(13).
For affirmance—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phoenix Apartments, Inc. v. Edgewater Park Sewerage Authority, 444 A.2d 51, 89 N.J. 2, 1982 N.J. LEXIS 1884 (N.J. 1982).
444 A.2d 51 (Phoenix Apartments, Inc. v. Edgewater Park Sewerage Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
NEW PROVIDENCE APART. v. Mayor
31 A.3d 958 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Ocean Seniors, LLC v. Tp. of Ocean Sewerage Auth.
928 A.2d 929 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories
625 A.2d 1066 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
Warrenville Plaza v. Warren Tp.
553 A.2d 874 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Meglino v. Township Committee of Eagleswood
510 A.2d 1134 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1986)
State v. McMinn
485 A.2d 1072 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Luv Condominium Ass'n v. Stanhope
469 A.2d 502 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)