Phœnix v. Hill

3 Johns. 249
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 249 (Phœnix v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phœnix v. Hill, 3 Johns. 249 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no evidence that the administrator, knowingly, brought a wrong action, and we are not to presume it. We are, therefore, of opinion that he ought to be allowed to discontinue without the payment of costs.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schildwachter v. Mayor of New York
33 N.Y.S. 41 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Lowerre v. Vail
5 Abb. Pr. 229 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
St. John v. Denison
9 How. Pr. 343 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Reeder v. Seely
4 Cow. 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Morse v. M'Coy
4 Cow. 551 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phnix-v-hill-nysupct-1808.